He'd probably recognise them for the busted flush they are. It's been over a decade since they lost and they don't have anywhere near the support to get another civil war going. The better bet is still the nationalist groups especially if it can be portrayed as a protectorate from the big bad commies further East.
There is an argument to be made for setting up a rump Russian Empire/Federation in Ukraine and Belarus in hopes of it providing a popular alternative, especially if the new government doesn't push for Russian domination and can cobble together a good economy. Even if it doesn't work, it would weaken the USSR.

Plus I love picturing thr Russjan Empire in Kiev and Stalin frothing at the mouth as he sees it
 
Fat chance of that. White emigres weren't exactly what you would call enlightened folk.
True, but this government would be little more than a German puppet, plus a lot of Russians did not consider Ukranians to be any different, same as how Prussians did not consider Bavarians to not be Germans, just... peasant Germans. Dismissive, but not necessarily terrible. And I imagine they could learn to play nice if the alternative is a return to the previous decade
 
Fat chance of that. White emigres weren't exactly what you would call enlightened folk.
It's a major reason the Whites lost the civil war. Sure things became evil vs evil once the Provisional government was out of the picture and the Bolshevik's ignored the election results but it was incompetent evil Vs competent evil and so Lenin's forces won the day.
 
“There is no more ridiculous concept in the history of world politics than the notion of pacifism, for pacifism is one of those rare inventions which is solely human. Animals do not comprehend pacifism; they consume and destroy as is necessary for survival, be it flora or fauna, and know none of the artificial guilt with which humanity is taught to wrack itself. In this way, I argue, war is the universal test; it is the rock against which we beat our fists, testing our resolve, and either our resolve breaks, or the enemy does.” - Excerpt from “The War in the East”, Werner von Blomberg, 1947
But loads of inventions are solely human - literature, the arts, language, science, the use of any tool more advanced than a stick, clothing, and cooking meat before you eat it, to name but a few.

Does Blomberg think all of those inventions are equally ridiculous, and that German soldiers should be sent into battle naked and unarmed, because that’s how animals fight?
 
But loads of inventions are solely human - literature, the arts, language, science, the use of any tool more advanced than a stick, clothing, and cooking meat before you eat it, to name but a few.

Does Blomberg think all of those inventions are equally ridiculous, and that German soldiers should be sent into battle naked and unarmed, because that’s how animals fight?
Most likely, yes. "Little (homosexual slur, plural) hiding in the (higher institution, plural) while real men make Germany (conservative militarist adjective)."
 
Most likely, yes. "Little (homosexual slur, plural) hiding in the (higher institution, plural) while real men make Germany (conservative militarist adjective)."
I assume he also lives in a cave and eats his meat raw, because that’s how animals do it, and apparently people should live like animals now.
 
But loads of inventions are solely human - literature, the arts, language, science, the use of any tool more advanced than a stick, clothing, and cooking meat before you eat it, to name but a few.

Does Blomberg think all of those inventions are equally ridiculous, and that German soldiers should be sent into battle naked and unarmed, because that’s how animals fight?
I would argue that art, language, and things of that nature are also things which animals have, albeit in a different form. Wales sing, birds decorate, otters open oysters and sea urchins to eat them.

But in the case of Blomberg, he is one of those hyper-militarists who sees civilisation as a great struggle for dominance and destruction, and advocated for the notion of "total war" and a dictatorship. To him, development is the pursuit of more efficient conquest rather rhan something to be pursued for its own sake. He will actually be appearing in the story later, as IRL at this point he had been relegated to East Prussia as pseudo-banishment after getting on von Schleicher’s bad side.

Spoiler: He will rise to popularity following his role defending the Fatherland by creating the Masurian Defence Front
 
Last edited:
True, but this government would be little more than a German puppet, plus a lot of Russians did not consider Ukranians to be any different, same as how Prussians did not consider Bavarians to not be Germans, just... peasant Germans. Dismissive, but not necessarily terrible. And I imagine they could learn to play nice if the alternative is a return to the previous decade
I don't see why the Germans would go through the problem of forcing the Whites to be reasonable instead of picking someone else. Plus, it has the downside that it lays the groundwork for an eventual incorporation into Russia if the USSR were to fall, which is exactly the opposite of what Germany wants. Communist or Tsarist, Germany wants to keep Ukraine separate and dependent on them forever, and the best way to do that is to support independence, de jure and de facto.
 
Last edited:
But in the case of Blomberg, he is one of those hyper-militarists who sees civilisation as a great struggle for dominance and destruction, and advocated for the notion of "total war" and a dictatorship. To him, development is the pursuit of more efficient conquest rather rhan something to be pursued for its own sake. He will actually be appearing in the story later, as IRL at this point he had been relegated to East Prussia as pseudo-banishment after getting on von Schleicher’s bad side.

Spoiler: He will rise to popularity following his role defending the Fatherland by creating the Masovian Defence Front
I’m not the only one who finds the Masovian Defence Front ominous in its mundane-sounding name, from his ideology and all that?
 
I would argue that art, language, and things of that nature are also things which animals have, albeit in a different form. Wales sing, birds decorate, otters open oysters and sea urchins to eat them.
But by that standard plenty of animals practice pacifistic survival strategies, like running away from enemies, or relying on camouflage to avoid being noticed by predators.
 
The title of the book being "The War in the East" makes me very suspicious that the World War will not be completely in the East, otherwise there would be no need for clarification. Japanese Ultramiltarism still happens, so the Pacific may very well catch on fire once the rest does. I have a feeling, however, this crisis is going to spawn over either the Czechs (Little Entente plus the Seudtenland or Polish (Do i need to say anything here?)


Speaking of the east though, how likely is it that the Germans try to buy Tsingtao back from the Chinese in exchange for ramping up military assistance?
 
All this discussion about the break-up of Ukraine and Belarus hits a wall: the Soviet Union will soon eclipse Germany industrially and militarily.
It's like the French Third Republic trying to return as the greatest power in continental Europe, but being blocked by a more populous German Empire, with higher birth rates and more industrialized.
 
Speaking of the east though, how likely is it that the Germans try to buy Tsingtao back from the Chinese in exchange for ramping up military assistance?
The KMT is never ever agreeing to that. The Chinese almost universally condemned the unequal treaties, and this would be seen as a continuation thereof. They might make commercial concessions, tho.
All this discussion about the break-up of Ukraine and Belarus hits a wall: the Soviet Union will soon eclipse Germany industrially and militarily.
It's like the French Third Republic trying to return as the greatest power in continental Europe, but being blocked by a more populous German Empire, with higher birth rates and more industrialized.
Well, Germany has several advantages, tho. They are a more cohesive force than the USSR decimated by Stalin's purges, that wouldn't have the threat of Nazi genocide to pull itself together, they can support internal resistance in the USSR, will have better access to world markets to keep themselves supplied, have a better trained army.
 
All this discussion about the break-up of Ukraine and Belarus hits a wall: the Soviet Union will soon eclipse Germany industrially and militarily.
It's like the French Third Republic trying to return as the greatest power in continental Europe, but being blocked by a more populous German Empire, with higher birth rates and more industrialized.
The same Soviet Union that almost loses to Finland just four years from now? And that likely won't have Lend-Lease, nor a distracted, genocidal Germany? It really could go either way without the Nutzis in charge.
 
The same Soviet Union that almost loses to Finland just four years from now? And that likely won't have Lend-Lease, nor a distracted, genocidal Germany? It really could go either way without the Nutzis in charge.
Especially with how, IIRC, quite a few issues the Red Army had in the Winter War and Barbarossa were due to Stalin purging a sizable proportion of his officer corps (even if recent estimates indicate that a smaller proportion of the officers were purged with the purge disproportionately targeting "flag" officers) a few years prior.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of the east though, how likely is it that the Germans try to buy Tsingtao back from the Chinese in exchange for ramping up military assistance?
The KMT is never ever agreeing to that. The Chinese almost universally condemned the unequal treaties, and this would be seen as a continuation thereof. They might make commercial concessions, tho.
This. As stated, the KMT opposed the unequal Treaties on almost every level and certainly wouldn't wish to cede more of the land they DO control to a foreign power. Yes, Germany might be able to get it back if they really pushed, but whatever small gains they'd earn would be far and out not worth it for how it would hurt their relationship with China.
All this discussion about the break-up of Ukraine and Belarus hits a wall: the Soviet Union will soon eclipse Germany industrially and militarily.
It's like the French Third Republic trying to return as the greatest power in continental Europe, but being blocked by a more populous German Empire, with higher birth rates and more industrialized.
While you are correct, also remember that this isn't Hitler and his quest for Lebensraum; von Lettow-Vorbeck is nowhere near foolish or arrogant enough to make plans for invading the Soviet Union on his own, and if he were to even try, it would only be upon securing allies. A lot of them. And as strong as the USSR is, even they couldn't stand against a big-enough coalition.

Not that I'm saying that happens, of course. This is all in good theorising fun
 
This. As stated, the KMT opposed the unequal Treaties on almost every level and certainly wouldn't wish to cede more of the land they DO control to a foreign power. Yes, Germany might be able to get it back if they really pushed, but whatever small gains they'd earn would be far and out not worth it for how it would hurt their relationship with China.
Especially as the Germans would gain more from a Chinese ally in the KMT than alienating China over some port that would be near-impossible to defend anyways.
 
Top