34. Hardly mid. She could have one or two more until about 37, but probably no older.Maria was already in her mid30s at her death.
34. Hardly mid. She could have one or two more until about 37, but probably no older.Maria was already in her mid30s at her death.
Amazing tree, the way everything was supposed to go. Long live the trastamarasFerdinand II of Aragon m. Isabella I of Castile
1) Isabella m. Alfonso VI of Portugal
2) John m. Catherine I of Navarre
3) Alfonso m. Joanna of Aragon and Naples
4) Joanna m. Philip IV of Burgundy
5) Maria m. Vladislaus II of Hungary and Bohemia
6) Ferdinand m. Bona Sforza
7) Katherine m. a) Arthur of Wales, b) Henry VIII of England
Almost 35 (and 34-37 is mid 30s for me)… And she would be 37 in 151934. Hardly mid. She could have one or two more until about 37, but probably no older.
Happy Jane survived but sad that Mary wasn't make a princess again.Henry VIII (1491-1547) m.¹ Katherine of Aragon (1485-1536) | m.² Anne Boleyn (1501-1535) | m.³ Jane Seymour (1504-1559)
1¹) Lady Mary Tudor (1516-)
2²) Princess Elizabeth Tudor (1533-)
3²) Edmund I of England (1535-)
4³) Edward, Duke of York (1537-)
No way Henry would marry Jane in this scenario…Jane was specifically set up as a foil to Anne by conservative Catholic courtiers and that wouldn’t work if Anne died giving birth to Henry’s heir. Much more likely Henry successfully remarries to either Christina of Denmark or Marie of guiseHenry VIII (1491-1547) m.¹ Katherine of Aragon (1485-1536) | m.² Anne Boleyn (1501-1535) | m.³ Jane Seymour (1504-1559)
1¹) Lady Mary Tudor (1516-)
2²) Princess Elizabeth Tudor (1533-)
3²) Edmund I of England (1535-)
4³) Edward, Duke of York (1537-)
No way a Holy Roman Emperor would be named John. It's because of this guyJohn the Holy Roman Emperor (b.1460-.1523) m Catherine of Saxony (b.1468-.1524)
Frederick had a son named John IOTL thoNo way a Holy Roman Emperor would be named John. It's because of this guy
Still.Frederick had a son named John IOTL tho
As you wish:Family tree of John III and Isabella please
YAY! LONG LIVE THE Trastamaras of spain and NaplesAs you wish:
Charles IV (1421-1468) King of Navarre 1441, King of Aragon 1458 m. a) Agnes of Cleves (1422-1448) b) Catherine of Portugal (1436-1463)
1a) Blanche (1440-1500) m. Afonso V (1432-1481) King of Portugal
1) Edward (1460-1464)2) Charles (1462)
2a) Eleanor (1442-1447)
3a) Agnes (1443-1469) a nun
4a) Joanna (1446-1499) m. Alfonso II (1448-1495) King of Naples
1) Isabella (1468-1527) m. Gian Galeazzo Sforza (1469-1514) Duke of Milan2) Agnes (1469-1536) m. Casimir I (1458-1509) King of Hungary [1]3) Ferdinand (1471-1476)4) Charles IV (1474-1528) King of Naples 1495, m. Agnes of Aragon (1478-1516)5) Alfonso (1475-1507) Duke of Bari, m. Beatrice d'Este (1475-1501)6) Joanna (1476-1482)7) Blanche (1479)8) Eleanor (1481-1532) m. Philibert II (1480-1520) Duke of Savoy
5a) John III (1448-1498) King of Aragon and Navarre 1468, King of Castile iure uxoris 1474, m. Isabella (1451-1504) Queen of Castile
1) John (1470-1473)2) Charles V/II/I (1472-1532) King of Aragon and Navarre 1498, King of Castile 1504, m. a) Anne of England (1475-1511), b) ???3) Isabella (1473-1495) m. Afonso VI (1475-1520) King of Portugal4) Joanna (1474-1531) m. Edward V (1470-1515) King of England5) Alfonso (1476-1478)6) Agnes (1478-1516) m. Charles IV (1474-1528) King of Naples7) Maria (1479-1553) m. Maximilian I (1459-1519) Holy Roman Emperor8) Catherine (1483-1537) m. John II (1485-1542) Duke of Burgundy
6b) Charles (1453-1508) m. Mary (1457-1511) Duchess of Burgundy
1) Philip (1476-1483) Count of Charolais2) Margaret (1478)3) Charles (1480-1486) Count of Charolais4) Margaret (1481-1482)5) John II (1485-1542) Duke of Burgundy 1511, m. Catherine of Aragon (1483-1537)6) Philip (1487)7) Catherine (1488-1553) m. Anthony (1489-1541) Duke of Lorraine
7b) Alfonso (1455-1458)
8b) Ferdinand (1457-1488) Archbishop of Zaragoza
9b) Eleanor (1460)
[1] OTL Saint Casimir Jagiellon, second son of Casimir IV of Poland. ITTL he get Hungarian throne in 1471 after unexpected death of Matthias Corvinus.
No way a Holy Roman Emperor would be named John. It's because of this guy
That's what I meant! Thanks, Alessio!Actually Eli would be more correct to say, that no Habsburg of the imperial family would want to use John as the first name for his first-born son, but I don't see why any non-Habsburg Emperors couldn't use John as a name, given that that episode is strictly and exclusively linked only to the dynastic events of the Habsburgs, is that it therefore has nothing to do with the history of the imperial office itself
Emperors Charles V and Ferdinand I also had sons named JohnFrederick had a son named John IOTL tho