Warning for last sentence. Rule 1.The 2012 United States Presidential Election: What if Roger Ailes never sexually assaulted Sarah Palin?
<Mod EDIT -Current political post removed>
Warning for last sentence. Rule 1.
Warning for last sentence. Rule 1.The 2012 United States Presidential Election: What if Roger Ailes never sexually assaulted Sarah Palin?
<Mod EDIT -Current political post removed>
Warning for last sentence. Rule 1.
DC"Reagan's a conservative, McDonald's a lunatic"
-Unofficial campaign slogan for Regan/Bush '84View attachment 871771
-------------------------------
The Castle Close to Shore:
Part I
--------------------------------
I would like to know why exactly you think that post is a violation of Rule 1.Warning for last sentence. Rule 1.
Well that entire last sentence sort of falls into that silo. Probably should have been a kick for introducing a SA of someone just for shits and giggles, but I chose to go light.I would like to know why exactly you think that post is a violation of Rule 1.
Apparently so, yes.What? Roger Ailes sexually assaulted Sarah Palin?
I think it might have something to do with the title of the thread. We're not supposed to use current politics (there's a separate thread in polchat for that) and while has-beens both mentioned persons are still somewhat active in politics.
Well the second post in this thread is Obama in 2020. 2012 was 11 years ago and Obama, Palin and Clinton are all retired. Abiding by the thread rules is part of why I made Obama bump Biden off the ticket.I think it might have something to do with the title of the thread. We're not supposed to use current politics (there's a separate thread in polchat for that) and while has-beens both mentioned persons are still somewhat active in politics.
It could be how you phrased it. Having the POD be "What if Roger Ailes never sexually assaulted Sarah Palin?" with no corralation on how that leads to Palin winning the nomination and then losing the general could be seen as taking the piss or being defamatory, espically considering the accusation of Ailes harassing Palin is not that well known.
Btw, speaking of the very notion of "Current Politics". It has always seemed to me, and this is more or less confirmed by experience, that in these threads it most often means "Current American Politics". I have a feeling that even if one uses for example Emmanuel Macron or Vladimir Putin, it won't cause much of a problem. And if one uses Élisabeth Borne or Mikhail Mishustin, it won't cause problems for sure.
I'm guessing Buchanan was executed for the Jaywalking part, wasn't he?A Glimpse into the NALverse: the new (and "improved") pre NAL president list
President of the Republic of America
For the leader of the Unrelated United States of the Americas see: President of the United States of the Americas; For the Leader of the Nation legally descended from the Republic of America, see: Head Archon of the New Achaean League, Most Loyal Advisor of the New Achaean League, Head of the National Ecclesia, and Achaean Leadership Issue.
The President of the Republic of America (from 1820 to 1832 the President of the American Nationalist Union) was the head of state/head of government of the Republic of America. The President directed the executive branch of the federal government and was the commander-in-chief of the Republic of America Armed Forces.
The power of the presidency was de facto near absolute, with the Senate and House of Peoples (representing the States and the non-Aboriginal Citizens, respectively) acting as rubber stamps when aligned with the president, and bypassed when not. Prior to its disbandment in 1832, it was by far the most powerful office in the nation, with only the Secretary of State (the de facto successor of the president in case of death) coming close to its power.
There were Thirteen Presidents in total, with the longest being William Wirt (serving for 15 years, 8 months, and 21 days), and the shortest being James Buchanan (serving for only 33 days). Two were independent or American Nationalist, and four were members of the Patriot League or the (First) Sons of Liberty.
The Presidency was formally and permanently disbanded on August 15, 1833, during the Tribunal for Crimes Committed against the People of the Nation (the term American going out of use after the Aneipota Enklimata of the Wirt Regime), with all living former Presidents (which was only Gallatin and Buchanan) being sentenced to Treason against the People of the Nation, with Gallatin being sentenced to a full banning from both national and state politics (he would later go on to form the Achaean Etymology Society, and be awarded the National Award of the Humanities for his help with preserving several near-extinct Aboriginal Achaean Languages), and Buchanan, after a long court battle lasting into early 1836, would be executed for his total support to the Wirt Regime, Treason against the People of the Nation, Embezzlement of State Funds, Unlawful use of Armed Forces, three counts of Third Degree Murder, and Jaywalking.
Is it a general consensus/opinion that McKinley living means no Roosevelt Presidency?Both parties faced battles at their respective conventions. On the Republican side, Vice President Theodore Roosevelt was the notable frontrunner, and was quite popular among much of the public and progressive circles of party leadership, however many conversative leaders (particularly President William McKinley who would break with him by 1903 over differing stances on trusts) would voice their opposition to Roosevelt's nomination as they feared his progressive stance on trusts would scare the more conversative, pro-business, pro-banker side of the party. This side of the party drafted another prominent McKinley cabinet member - Attorney General Philander C. Knox, a notably conservative candidate in comparison to Roosevelt. Knox with the support of McKinley and much of the party's dominant conservative wing would narrowly win the nomination on the first ballot, leading to Roosevelt threatening to walkout of the convention. However, he would be assuaged by the inclusion of an antitrust plank (albeit weaker and less substantive than Roosevelt's proposals) to the Republican platform, and the choice of progressive Senator of Iowa Jonathan P. Dolliver for Vice President.
Realistically, that's probably the case (he was made VP to limit his political star power)Is it a general consensus/opinion that McKinley living means no Roosevelt Presidency?
Or just butterflies away by a few years.
One of the redactions fails because you've included their name in a later boxThis is an extremely long time in the making. Around September 2019, in another place, I started working on something I called The Castle Close to Shore. Last year I revisited it and made an array of personnel and election wikiboxes for it, but didn't quite finish. Over the last few weeks I've tinkered with them again and finished them all up, which allows me to finally present this series in an essentially finished form.
As this series contains a number of current political figures, I have made a number of redactions. You can see an uncensored version of the image here.
The Republican machine was just too powerful for him to bend to his will by 1904. Mckinley's conservatism was the rule of the land, and the progressive movement was still too ingrained with the more agrarian and populist democrats or the republican farmer labor bloc (that's why the only real progressive forces in the GOP were like Borah in Idaho).Is it a general consensus/opinion that McKinley living means no Roosevelt Presidency?
Or just butterflies away by a few years.