What if Charles Martel lived (1327) to succeed his Grandfather? Who could he marry, who could his sisters marry, and what would be the consequences of his survival?
I could be wrong but IIRC his dad was named Prince of Florence, after his death, the Florentines refused to allow the title to transmit to Giovanna or Maria. I'm not sure how they would feel about a little boy inheriting, but I doubt they would be able to use the same excuse as they did for Giovanna (her gender). Also, the presence of a son might buoy Naples' position in Italy for longer. OTL, once the duke of Calabria died, essentially Roberto lost interest in most of Italy north of Rome and Ludwig IV swept in to fill the vacuum. With a grandson to root for (albeit he can't do much while he's still dirtying nappies but it's a bit more complicated for the Italians to use their argument for abandoning Giovanna- namely we'd really like to support you King Bob but your son is dead and girls aren't gonna cut it.What if Charles Martel lived (1327) to succeed his Grandfather? Who could he marry, who could his sisters marry, and what would be the consequences of his survival?
(did he have sisters, ICR?)
No reason for marrying Joanna to Andrew here instead of the most logical match with LouisAs far as I know, Andrew and Louis did not have any sisters who lived past cradle, I think Andrew (probably duke of Slavonia, or maybe king of Poland if Charles Robert would want to secure any throne for his second son and @Jan Olbracht could have his independent post Elbow-High Poland) would still marry Joanna, tho she would have less to say, being seated in either Slavonia or Poland and thus unable to murder her husband.
No reason for marrying Joanna to Andrew here instead of the most logical match with Louis
In OTL Louis was engaged to Mary of Naples between 1332 and 1343 while Joanna was promised to Andrew…. Here Joanna would be the bride promised to Louis and if he choose to marry elsewhere she surely would not marry his younger brotherNot really, Louis's first wife was Charles IV of Bohemia's sister, and given the fact Luxembourgs were most prominent opponents of Hungarian Angevins that match would be still more important that Neapolitan one.
In OTL Louis was engaged to Mary of Naples between 1332 and 1343 while Joanna was promised to Andrew…. Here Joanna would be the bride promised to Louis and if he choose to marry elsewhere she surely would not marry his younger brother
Yes, they were engaged with a Papal Bull to confirm the double engagement. Margaret of Bohemia was engaged in 1338 but NOT to Louis as she was the first of the 4 princesses engaged to Amadeus VI of Savoy (followed by French brides - Joanna of Bourbon from 1340 to 1344, then Joan of Burgundy and in the end he married Bonne of Bourbon, Joanna’s younger sister in 1355). And until Charles Martel had children of his own Joanna would remain her brother’s heiress and the so the chances of inheriting Naples with that marriage were not so small…Was he? As far as I know, Charles Robert promised Luxembourgs that Louis will marry Margaret of Luxembourg (Charles IV's sister) in 1338, and they actually got married in 1345, so I am very skeptical towards that information + from Hungarian POV Bohemia is simply more important than Naples, with Charles Martel alive Hungarian Angevins cannot hope to inherit Naples and Bohemia is only serious challenge to Hungarian Angevins in the region which was their actual powerbase.
Catherine, Duchess of Swidnica and Elizabeth, Duchess of Opole are the elder sisters of Andrew and Louis but they are too old for Charles Martel.As far as I know, Andrew and Louis did not have any sisters who lived past cradle, I think Andrew (probably duke of Slavonia, or maybe king of Poland if Charles Robert would want to secure any throne for his second son and @Jan Olbracht could have his independent post Elbow-High Poland) would still marry Joanna, tho she would have less to say, being seated in either Slavonia or Poland and thus unable to murder her husband.
Yes, they were engaged with a Papal Bull to confirm the double engagement. Margaret of Bohemia was engaged in 1338 but NOT to Louis as she was the first of the 4 princesses engaged to Amadeus VI of Savoy (followed by French brides - Joanna of Bourbon from 1340 to 1344, then Joan of Burgundy and in the end he married Bonne of Bourbon, Joanna’s younger sister in 1355). And until Charles Martel had children of his own Joanna would remain her brother’s heiress and the so the chances of inheriting Naples with that marriage were not so small…
Catherine, Duchess of Swidnica and Elizabeth, Duchess of Opole are the elder sisters of Andrew and Louis but they are too old for Charles Martel.
But that would mean no wedding between Naples and Hungary NOT Joanna married to Andrew (match for which Naples here has under zero interest)…Well, than that engagement needed to be broken up and the maths is simple - Naples is unable to muster full-scale invasion of Hungary proper and Bohemia is able to do so, so it seems pretty clear to whom the priority in Louis's marriage goes.
But that would mean no wedding between Naples and Hungary NOT Joanna married to Andrew (match for which Naples here has under zero interest)…
No way, Andrew would be a very bad match for Joanna… and her family has zero reasons for accepting it. Maybe a match in the next generation (or Andrew-Maria but only if they had been engaged at the same time of Louis and Joanna)Well, maybe Charles Martel, once adult could marry some Hungarian proxy and be done with it if Joanna-Andrew match is not really tenable.
No way, Andrew would be a very bad match for Joanna… and her family has zero reasons for accepting it. Maybe a match in the next generation (or Andrew-Maria but only if they had been engaged at the same time of Louis and Joanna)
I agreeWell, I'd say next generation match is more likely.