bookmark95
Banned
Certainly. But even the most conformist societies do provide outs for people who do not fit in.
I'm hardly the most neurotypical person, so I can sympathize. In the case of autism spectrum conditions, though there is more than one way to be seen as a participating member of society. Indeed, most normal people will opt for the bare minimum even in the most mobilized of times. They might go to local assemblies once a month, or go to their cooperative's quarterly meeting to kibbitz and vote on managers or policy programs.
To the extent that psychological disorders will be identified earlier, they might wrongly attribute them to social causes, or develop different terminology. For example, post-traumatic stress disorder is colloquially referred to as "having a WW2 flashback," (compare the notion of "Vietnam flashback"), and they might often attribute it to fascism itself, rather than pure trauma, at least initially. Autism would likely be identified earlier, but misattributed to a malformed society, the anti-social nature of capitalism inflicting itself on victims from an early age.
They'll probably develop similar therapeutic coping mechanisms as OTL, but find that a "cure" eludes them. In the mean time, people with autism might be seen as victims, and find other ways for them to flourish, as have many in the past.
In spite of social democratic reforms, ideology will still influence medical practices?
Any psychologist can say that autism comes from birth, but OTL there are idiots who say it comes from vaccination. ITTL, could we have people argue that its the result of "bourgeois influence?"
OTL, there were people who believed that water fluoridation was a communist plot. Could there be extremists who also claim fluoridation is a Franco-British plot?