In March 1548, Catherine became pregnant for the first time at age thirty-five. This pregnancy was a surprise as Catherine had not conceived a child during her first three marriages. As sex during pregnancy was frowned upon during the sixteenth century, Seymour began to take an interest in Lady Elizabeth. Seymour had reputedly plotted to marry her before marrying Catherine, and it was reported later that Catherine discovered the two in an embrace. On a few occasions before the situation risked getting completely out of hand, Catherine appears not only to have acquiesced in episodes of sexually charged horseplay, but actually to have assisted her husband.[28] Whatever actually happened, Elizabeth was sent away in May 1548 to stay with Sir Anthony Denny's household at Cheshunt and never saw her beloved stepmother again, although the two corresponded.
So What if the Great Caretaker-Queen Catherine had lucked out with having her only child a few years earlier than IOTL? Assuming Henry and Catherine are able to conceive on their wedding night, and a son is born to the Queen around Mid-March 1544? For arguments sake, lets name the child William, after Catherine's distinguished ancestor(Whom served in Edward IV's Court)? How might this future Duke of York be raised in Catherine' enlightened Protestant household? Assuming that Catherine doesn't succumb to complications of child birth ITTL? Might this be enough for Henry upon his death to ensure Catherine(What most thought was going to happen IOTL, during Henry's last French campaign IOTL) to rule as Regent till Edward reached maturity? What happens to Mary and Elizabeth in terms of the succession? And if Edward dies around the same time as IOTL, would William"s ascension to the throne at the age of 9, prove to be drama-free in the rocky world of Tudor England in the 1550's...Can't wait to see what you guys come up with