So let's say, hypothetically
What if Weimar Republic was actually a stable republic and successfully get rid of radical factions in the nation such as communist and nazis, while Japan remain unchanged
Will the US maintain the global influence we have after the war?
There would be no global war, no US mass mobilization, no US military success on four continents (Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania), no US consciousness of vast military power and international responsibility. The US would remain important. It would not be a hegemonic hyperpower.
Will Japan get their ass handed by the US and Britain far sooner?
If there is no war in Europe, then in going to war as OTL, Japan would be challenging the British Empire, the US (if as OTL Japan was convinced that the US would intervene in support of Britain), and probably France, by itself, while deeply entangled in China, and threatened by the USSR. Japan was crazy, but not that crazy. There would be no Pacific War.
if yes then would Operation Downfall be greenlighted...
No Pacific War.
...instead of the US dropping nukes?
The Manhattan Project was launched at the urging of scientists who didn't like the idea of atomic bombs, but were very afraid that Nazi Germany might develop them first. The political leaders provided the enormous budget required because the US was at war, and because they also worried about Nazi Germany. If there is no Nazi Germany and no US war against Nazi Germany, there is no Manhattan Project.
What would fascism be? Would Mussolini Italy survived past 1940? etc etc.
An important on-going political tendency. Mussolini would not provoke a war with any other major power, so he would remain in power, probably till his death around 1955-1960.
Im curious about the butterfly effect this will cause, and mostly because I need some ideas for my ATL im going to write
You mean knock-ons. Butterfly effects are by definition unpredictable, other than different from OTL.
The knock-ons include different defense policies for other powers, especially Britain, France, the UK, and the USSR.
It also changes the diplomatic and military balance in the 1930s.
One obvious knock-on is that Britain and France would not be dependent on Italy to prevent the union of Austria with Germany. Thus they could act more decisively against Italian aggression in Abyssinia. (OTL's policy achieved bad outcomes at both ends. It failed to deter or abort Italy's invasion, and it offended Mussolini enough that Italy became Germany's ally, and of course ceased to oppose Anschluss.) IIRC, the League of Nations issued a futile denunciation of Italy, but it accomplished nothing because Britain and France didn't act. If they do, it might provide the League with a good deal more credibility.