Why the Chinese play cricket (an Imperial Federation timeline)

Oct-Dec 1906: Taking flight
~Oct-Dec 1906: Taking flight

October 1906: With the success of the Madsen light machine gun during the Chinese Civil War, British businessman Henry de Morgan Snell has founded the Rexel Small Arms company to produce the weapon under licence for sale within the Empire. Intelligence from China has lead to considerable interest from the army and a series of trials. These trials however show persistent feed issues. Having received two early production examples of the Chengdu machine carbine and being impressed by it, de Morgan Snell hires Prasan Tendulkar to redesign the Madsen to meet British requirements.

October 1906: The military cooperation which has been developing between Denmark and Norway shows it's first practical results with the announcement of a joint naval program. Under this plan, the Danish coastal battleship Iver Hvitfeldt, along with the Norwegian Harald Haarfagre and Tordenskjold will undergo a major refits at the Copenhagen Royal Dockyard. A class of 500 ton fast destroyer minelayers is also ordered, two for each navy. However as the Royal Dockyard will be fully occupied with refitting the battleships, these will be built in the private Danish yards. The program also includes the construction of six submarines in the Horton Naval Yard, four for Denmark and two for Norway. Work on these submarines will begin next year with technical assistance from the US.

October 1906: Using a courtesy visit by the battleship Asahi to San Francisco as cover, Japanese Foreign Minister Hayashi Tadasu meets with US Secretary of State Elihu Root in secret to discuss policy regarding China. With the ejection of Russia from Manchuria and the end of the Chinese Civil War both governments regard stability in China as vital. Concerned by the need to counter the potential German influence with the Zheng, they agree a diplomatic approach is best initially, with Hayashi stressing the importance of Japanese support for Yuan Shikai's coup and suggesting full diplomatic recognition of the Zheng. While Root rejects this option, preferring to continue to recognise the Xianfa as the legitimate government of all China, he agrees some form of formal diplomatic contact is essential, suggesting establishing consular representation as an alternative. The Asahi Talks end with broad agreement that cultivating contacts with the Zheng to avoid them falling under German influence and supporting the growing British influence with the Xianfa is the best approach for maintaining the fragile peace in China.

October 1906: American born British aviation pioneer Samuel Cody obtains permission from Alberto Santos-Dumont to commercially manufacture a version of his No. 20 Criança. Produced in kit form with a choice of 15kw, 22.5kw or 30kw engines for £300 {£286}, the Criança will prove extremely popular with over 100 sold. However attempts to sell the Criança in the US will be blocked by the Wright Brothers claiming patent violations. Nonetheless in Europe, many early aviators will learn to fly in a Criança, giving the European aviation industry a vital boost over the US.

October 1906: Shah Mozzafar an-Din of Persia's extravagant lifestyle has incited widespread unrest in the country. In response to this unrest, he convenes a commission to draw up a written constitution for the nation. This will immediately lead to conflict between the Russian and British over control of the nation.

November 1906: With the only remaining obstacle appearing to preventing French Prime Minister Waldeck-Rousseau's long sought Anglo-French alliance being Anglo-Russian rivalry in Central Asia, he has been engaged in frantic negotiations in order to arrange an Conference aimed at resolving the matter. Unfortunately, there widespread opposition to any form of rapprochement in both governments. However eventually agree is reached for a French mediated conference to be held in St Petersburg in January.

November 1906: While highly controversial Government of India Bill is passed by the Commons after its alteration in September, it fails in the Lords. Despite Prime Minister Dilke wanting to use the provisions of the parliament act to bypass the Lords veto, moderates in the Liberal Party led by Joseph Chamberlains son Austen, supported by the Federalist Party, are able to convince cabinet the bill is too controversial and should be abandoned. Instead a commission headed by former Viceroy Lord Wallington is established to develop a less radical set of reforms.

November 1906: By the end of the Chinese Civil War, the Zheng had over 620,000 men under arms. While there has been no demobilisation, a steady stream of desertions by troops unwilling to continue to serve has reduced this to around 540,000. With the Xianfa having demobilised at the end of the previous year, this now far outnumbers the remaining Xianfa forces. Many of Emperor Shikai's supporters have been urging him to take advantage of the situation by resuming hostilities, hoping to comprehensively defeat their opponents before they can rebuild their strength. The matters has dominated discussions within the Zheng Grand Council for many months, with the Emperor remaining undecided. Eventual he decides against any resumption of hostilities, refusing to fall into what he sees as the trap of underestimate the Xianfa as the Dowager Empress did. With the Boxer and Civil Wars primarily fought on Zheng territory he feels rebuilding should be the first priority, with the aim of exploiting Northern China's rich mineral resources To develop an industrialised economy. As a first step the hugely expensive army should be reduced to 250,000 regulars maintained by one year of universal conscription, giving a powerful standing army supported by a substantial reserve available on mobilisation.

November 1906: Unlike the Government of India Bill, the Regional Government Bill is narrowly passed by the Lords in return for a guarantee the Liberal-Federalist government will not introduce any further such legislation during the current Parliamentary term. While the program of devolution along with land reform has satisfied many Irish nationalists, the powers thus far granted fall far below those of the Dominions and there remains a core of Irish nationalist demanding either full Dominion status or even outright independence. With the government now guaranteeing no further devolution until at least 1911, thirteen Irish Federalist MPs headed by John Dillon leave the party to reform the Irish National League, demanding full Dominion status for Ireland.

November 1906: With memories of the turmoil of the late 1890s fading and nationalist sentiment soaring after the Tangier Crisis, the 1906 elections see a radical change in French politics. The surge in support for the right will see Gabriel Hantaux's conservatives take the largest number of seats, though only 24 more than Waldeck-Rousseau's moderates. However, Paul Déroulède's boulangists ultra-nationalist policies result in a significant increase in their number of deputies. With the constitution allowing the party with the largest number of deputies ten days to form a government, Hantaux is able to form a coalition with the boulangists, replacing Waldeck-Rousseau as Prime Minister.

December 1906: The British army's experiments with the military use of motor vehicles have proven successful in demonstrating their potential usefulness on the battlefield. In light of this result the Experimental Motor Force is regularised as the single company Motor Corps to further develop the concept.

December 1906: After the limited success of his first airship, the LZ1, Ferdinand von Zeppelin has continued his work in an attempt to improve the design. This culminated with the construction of the LZ2 in 1905. While the improved design showed promise, it suffered serious instability and crashed shortly into its second flight. Undeterred, von Zeppelin produced yet another improved design, the LZ3, which will be the first truly successful rigid airship. After conducting a number of flights of several hours duration, the design attracted the interest of the German Army who were willing to purchase the craft after several modifications. While these have taken several months, they have proved successful with the airship accepted into German service as the Z I, the world's first military airship.

December 1906: During the South American Naval Arms Race of the 1880s and 1890s, the Brazilian navy become one of the most powerful in the world. However the financial crisis which followed resulted in it being run down as a cost cutting measure, leaving only four effective warships in service. With the Brazilian economy booming due demand for coffee and rubber, Prime Minister Rodrigues Alves authorises the construction of two dreadnoughts and three scout cruisers in British yards to rebuild the Imperial Navy. With Brazil seeming have no need for such a power vessel, there is widespread speculation they are working as a proxy for another power, with Russia being frequently mentioned. These rumours become so widespread, the British obtain assurances from the Brazilian government the ships will not be resold.

December 1906: The Australian federal elections again result in a hung parliament, with the Protectionist Party, Free Trade Party and Labour Party again finely balanced in the house. With the issues around tariffs having largely been resolved over the past six years, the Protectionist and Free Trade parties form a coalition to keep the socialist Labour Party out of power, allowing Alfred Deakin to remain Premier.
 
Forgive me for going off topic a bit but I am curious as to the infrastructure development throughout the empire. More specifically the development of railways and ports in areas that didn't see much of anything for decades beyond OTL but with the increase in Indian development and with China being opened up much earlier. Prince Rupert in Canada as an example was incorporated in 1906 OTL and is the closest port to East Asia that is connected to the North American rail network. With increased development in Canada and the more Pacific focused empire ITTL I could see this moved up a few years. In Australia, Darwin likewise should see significantly increased investment over OTL in port and rail infrastructure to facilitate trade with India and China. Those are two obvious ones but ports and railways to support them throughout the Indian ocean should see significantly increased investment and development. Even a small increase in the GDP/PP in India would translate to an extremely large overall increase just because of the massive population. Ports throughout Indian should be expanded and expanded again in a near continuous cycle just to absorb the growth. It would I believe start on the West Coast of India in Mumbai, Karachi, and Thiruvananthapuram; being closest to the Suez Canal; but spread rapidly to the East coast as the sheer scale of the development overwhelms the ability of trade happening just through western ports.

In the same vein railways should be increasingly diverging from OTL in an overall more cohesive British Empire. Looking at India it was only in 1901 OTL that a railway board was established and I expect that to be pushed up a few years. In addition I would expect that the nationalization of railways would be pushed ahead from 1907 OTL for reasons similar to OTL with a very early push to standardize everything to an Empire standard gauge; which I am actually surprised hasn't been mentioned yet in an imperial conference. India is hugely populous and only railways will be able to move the people and goods necessary to truly develop the region. Colonial India in OTL by 1901 was 3/4 of the population of the entire empire (300 million of 400 million total) and given the marginally better treatment over OTL this would be pushed up ever so slightly. Canada, Australia, and South Africa as well should see far increased investment in railways over OTL in part because there is simply more money to throw around and in part because a push to empire wide autarky would mean a push to develop the interiors of each country. Africa probably won't see a large increase but even a rounding error in the budget over OTL would be a large increase locally.
 
From what I read Darwin was tiny and is essentially an island (no good land connection to anything, and any important place in Australia is thousands of miles away). I don't think there is any real need to improve port at Darwin (beyond local needs) and connect it by rail to the rest of the country. After all I think a bit longer shipping route to Sydney and other cities is still much cheaper than shipping it to Darwin and sending it onward by rail. Sea transportation is cheaper than by rail.
 
Seems odd that the government would decline to use the Parliament Bill for its specific purpose, however I can't wait for the Lords to be bypassed so they can see the vulnerability of their position.
 
From what I read Darwin was tiny and is essentially an island (no good land connection to anything, and any important place in Australia is thousands of miles away). I don't think there is any real need to improve port at Darwin (beyond local needs) and connect it by rail to the rest of the country. After all I think a bit longer shipping route to Sydney and other cities is still much cheaper than shipping it to Darwin and sending it onward by rail. Sea transportation is cheaper than by rail.
Outside of the South East virtually all of Australia are islands in a desert. As for the why there are a lot of reasons and not just Darwin but Perth, Cairns, Adelaide as well:

1) For all the mines in the area. Just as it is easier to ship things over transport by rail it is also easier to transport by rail a couple hundred kilometres rather than a couple thousand. More money to throw around in general will drive development faster and development begets development.

2) For strategic reasons. It is better to have 2 or 3 large ports and a half dozen medium ports rather than 1 or 2 really large ports. More flexibility for shippers and more ports for the Royal Navy to use.

3) Nation building. Never underestimate the value of nation building projects to drive things when simple economics would make it seem stupid. Does a railroad linking Adelaide, Perth and Darwin make sense economically? I don't want to look at the numbers but I feel confident in saying absolutely not even into the present day. Does the railroad "link the nation together"? I bet a lot of politicians are willing to make that case when there isn't enough money to be made.

4) Actual development. People will follow where the jobs are. Spreading out those jobs not only makes more of them available due to less economies of scale; again with the multiple large ports rather than 1 super port and all the services required for the people who work at those ports; but also prevents one city or region from completely dominating the economy and permanently messing the other regions. Darwin in OTL up to the present day is less than 150,000 people. With good development and investment you could easily triple that or more which leads to a far more dynamic and prosperous city which is good for Australia as a whole. Perth and Adelaide couldn't see quite that growth but any growth that can be steered away from the South East can make Australia in general more balanced and prosperous. The same goes for Canada; it doesn't take a lot of people in 1910 to translate to very large population growth over OTL in a lot of regions; the example I'll use for Canada is Kelowna BC, it is around 800 people right now OTL. Get another 1500 people there for 2,300 total due to more industry being built in Canada and suddenly Kelowna is 15 years ahead of its OTL growth. Get 4,000 people and you're 35 years ahead of OTL.
 
Navies 1906

======/

British Empire

Dreadnoughts

Bellerophon class
18,800 tons, 8 x 12”, 8 (16) x 4”, 11” belt, 3” deck, 21 knots Tu WT Coal
- Bellerophon, ordered 1906, laid down 12/1906, commissioned 2/1909
- Superb, ordered 1906, laid down 2/1907, commissioned 5/1909
- Temeraire, ordered 1906, laid down 1/1907, commissioned 5/1909

Scout Cruisers

Boadicea class
3,300 tons, 4 (6) x 4”, 1 (2) x 18” TT dk, 1.5” slope, 1” deck, 25 knots Tu WT Coal
- Boadicea, ordered 1906, laid down 6/1907, commissioned 7/1909, sold to Argentina 7/1912
- Bellona, ordered 1906, laid down 2/1907, commissioned 2/1909, sold to Argentina 7/1912

======/

United States

Dreadnoughts

South Carolina class
16,500 tons, 8 x 12", 8 (16) x 3”, 1 (2) x 21” TT uw, 9" belt, 1.5" deck, 19(20) knots TE WT Coal
- South Carolina, ordered 1906, laid down 3/1907, commissioned 7/1910
- Michigan, ordered 1906, laid down 5/1907 commissioned 11/1910

======/

Japan

Scout Cruisers

Yodo class
1,250 tons, 2 x 4.7”, 2 (4) x 3”, 1 (2) x 18” TT dk, 2.5” slope, 1.5” deck, 22 knots Tu WT Coal
- Yodo, ordered 1906, laid down 10/1906, commissioned 7/1908
- Mogami, ordered 1906, laid down 3/1907, commissioned 9/1908

======/

Germany

Dreadnoughts

Nassau class
18,000 tons, 8 (12) x 11”, 6 (12) x 6”, 8 (16) x 3.5”, 1 (4) x 18” TT uw 1 bow 1 stn, 12” belt, 2” deck, 19.5 knots TE WT Coal
- Nassau, ordered 1906, laid down 7/1907, commissioned 9/1910
- Westfalen, ordered 1906, laid down 6/1907, commissioned 8/1910
- Anhalt, ordered 1906, laid down 6/1907, commissioned 10/1910

Heavy Cruisers

Blücher class
15,600 tons, 8 (12) x 8.2”, 4 (8) x 6”, 8 (16) x 3.5”, 2 (4) x 18” TT uw, 7” belt, 2” deck, 24 knots TE WT
- Blücher, ordered 1906, laid down 2/1907, commissioned 3/1910
- Wrangel, ordered 1906, laid down 5/1907, commissioned 11/1909

Light Cruisers

Kolberg class
4,300 tons, 6 (12) x 4", 1 (2) x 18” TT aw, 100 mines, 1.5" slope, 1" deck, 25 knots Tu WT Coal
- Kolberg, ordered 1906, laid down 2/1908, commissioned 6/1910
- Mainz, ordered 1906, laid down 1/1907, commissioned 10/1909
- Cöln, ordered 1906, laid down 1/1908, commissioned 6/1911
- Ausberg, ordered 1906, laid down 4/1908, commissioned 11/1911

======/

France

Battleships

Danton class
19,000 tons, 5 (6) x 12”, 4 (8) x 7.6”, 6 (12) x 3”, 1 (2) x 18” TT uw, 10” belt, 2” deck, 20 knots Tu SW Coal, short range, unreliable machinery
- Danton, ordered 1906, laid down 8/1906, commissioned 6/1910
- Condorcet, ordered 1906, laid down 1/1907, commissioned 7/1910
- Diderot, ordered 1906, laid down 4/1907, commissioned 8/1910

======/

Italy

Light Cruisers

Campania class
2,500 tons, 4 (6) x 6", 3 x 3” AA, 1" slope, 0.5" deck, 16 knots TE WT Coal
- Campania, ordered 1906, laid down 8/1913, commissioned 4/1917
- Basilicata, ordered 1906, laid down 8/1913, commissioned 8/1917

======/

Austria-Hungary

Battleships

Radetzsy class
14,500 tons, 4 x 12”, 4 (8)x 9.4”, 10 (20) x 4”, 1 (3) x 21” TT uw 1 stn, 9” belt, 2” deck, 20.5 knots Tu WT Coal
- Radetzsy, ordered 1906, laid down 11/1907, commissioned 1/1911
- Erzherzog Franz Fredinand, ordered 1906, laid down 9/1907, commissioned 6/1910
- Zrinyi, ordered 1906, laid down 1/1909, commissioned 9/1911

======/

Other Nations

Brazilian Dona Isabel class dreadnought (built in Britain)
19,300 tons, 10 (12) x 12", 11 (22) x 4.7”, 9" belt, 2.5" deck, 21 knots TE WT Coal, limited belt
- Dona Isabel, ordered 1906, laid down 4/1907, commissioned 4/1910
- Dom Pedro II, ordered 1906, laid down 4/1907 commissioned 5/1910

Brazilian Bahia class scout cruiser (built in Britain)
3,300 tons, 7 (10) x 4.7”, 1 (2) x 18” TT dk, 1” slope, 0.5” deck, 27 knots Tu WT Coal
- Bahia, ordered 1906, laid down 8/1907, commissioned 1/1910
- Ceara, ordered 1906, laid down 8/1907, commissioned 5/1910
- Maranhoa, ordered 1906, laid down 8/1907, commissioned 11/1909

Norwegian Harald Haarfagre class coastal battleship (refit)
3,900 tons, 2 x 8.3", 2 (4) x 6”, 3 (6) x 4”, 1 (2) x 18” TT uw, 7" belt, 2.5" deck, 17 knots TE WT Coal, low freeboard
- Harald Haarfagre, ordered 1895, laid down 3/1896, commissioned 1/1897, refit 1906, begun 7/1907, recommissioned 12/1908
- Tordenskjold, ordered 1895, laid down 3/1896, commissioned 3/1897, refit 1906, begun 3/1909, recommissioned 8/1910

Danish Iver Hvitfeldt class coastal battleship (refit)
3,500 tons, 2 x 9.4", 3 (6) x 6”, 3 (6) x 4”, 1 (4) x 15” TT uw 1 bow 1 stn, 9" belt, 2.5" deck, 16 knots TE WT Coal, low freeboard
- Iver Hvitfeldt, ordered 1883, laid down 4/1884, commissioned 7/1886, refit 1906, begun 9/1907, recommissioned 4/1910
 
Last edited:
Interested in your second Canadian state. My grandmother's uncle - a chap called Alwyn Bramley-Moore was an Albertan MP and advocate for Albertan separatism before the first war (he was killed in 1916 on the western front) His book Canada and her colonies, home rule for Alberta published in 1911 is still available https://www.amazon.co.uk/Canada-Colonies-Home-Rule-Alberta/dp/B01BZIYQ3C

Maybe Alywn gets a starring role!

As an aside there is also a book of his letters to his 5 children from the trenches that was collated and published. I met three of them in their old age. He was for an Edwardian something of an atheist and a believer in the education and careers of women and had a radical bent i think
 
Seems odd that the government would decline to use the Parliament Bill for its specific purpose, however I can't wait for the Lords to be bypassed so they can see the vulnerability of their position.
Wow didn't realise it'd almost been a month since I updated this. Sorry my life got a little more complicated than normal, my life has a very distressing habit of doing that far far too often, probably due to the fact it's rather complicated to start with. So replies lol

The comments about the economic infrastructure development of the empire are incredibly pertinent and very useful. But sadly will require a somewhat in depth reply which may take awhile.

However this one is easy. The proposed reforms in India where incredibly controversial and damn nearly split the Liberal Party. The prospect of having the controversy dragged out for another two years is why the didn't override the Lords veto. Instead they've delayed to try and work out more moderate set of reforms.
 
Interested in your second Canadian state. My grandmother's uncle - a chap called Alwyn Bramley-Moore was an Albertan MP and advocate for Albertan separatism before the first war (he was killed in 1916 on the western front) His book Canada and her colonies, home rule for Alberta published in 1911 is still available https://www.amazon.co.uk/Canada-Colonies-Home-Rule-Alberta/dp/B01BZIYQ3C

Maybe Alywn gets a starring role!

As an aside there is also a book of his letters to his 5 children from the trenches that was collated and published. I met three of them in their old age. He was for an Edwardian something of an atheist and a believer in the education and careers of women and had a radical bent i think
Thank you, incredibly interesting and I can definitely see a potential role for your ancestor lol. I will be reading up on him to see how he could fit in.
 
Forgive me for going off topic a bit but I am curious as to the infrastructure development throughout the empire. More specifically the development of railways and ports in areas that didn't see much of anything for decades beyond OTL but with the increase in Indian development and with China being opened up much earlier. Prince Rupert in Canada as an example was incorporated in 1906 OTL and is the closest port to East Asia that is connected to the North American rail network. With increased development in Canada and the more Pacific focused empire ITTL I could see this moved up a few years. In Australia, Darwin likewise should see significantly increased investment over OTL in port and rail infrastructure to facilitate trade with India and China. Those are two obvious ones but ports and railways to support them throughout the Indian ocean should see significantly increased investment and development. Even a small increase in the GDP/PP in India would translate to an extremely large overall increase just because of the massive population. Ports throughout Indian should be expanded and expanded again in a near continuous cycle just to absorb the growth. It would I believe start on the West Coast of India in Mumbai, Karachi, and Thiruvananthapuram; being closest to the Suez Canal; but spread rapidly to the East coast as the sheer scale of the development overwhelms the ability of trade happening just through western ports.
ITTL the population of Britain and the white Dominions in 1901 is around 59 million as against 55 million in the OTL. You'll also see the same pattern in European settlers in Africa etc. The one exception is India where increased education and economic development is retarding population growth (233m ITTL against 239m OTL).

This trend is particularly strong in Australia, NZ and most dramatically the Canadian Midwest and Pacific coast (1901-1911 Alberta's pop grew 400% in the OTL, BC nearly 200%, this growth will be significantly higher ITTL). So yes places like Darwin, Prince Rupert etc will be getting significantly increased infrastructure development
In the same vein railways should be increasingly diverging from OTL in an overall more cohesive British Empire. Looking at India it was only in 1901 otl that a railway board was established and I expect that to be pushed up a few years. In addition I would expect that the nationalization of railways would be pushed ahead from 1907 OTL for reasons similar to OTL with a very early push to standardize everything to an Empire standard gauge; which I am actually surprised hasn't been mentioned yet in an imperial conference. India is hugely populous and only railways will be able to move the people and goods necessary to truly develop the region. Colonial India in OTL by 1901 was 3/4 of the population of the entire empire (300 million of 400 million total) and given the marginally better treatment over OTL this would be pushed up ever so slightly. Canada, Australia, and South Africa as well should see far increased investment in railways over OTL in part because there is simply more money to throw around and in part because a push to empire wide autarky would mean a push to develop the interiors of each country. Africa probably won't see a large increase but even a rounding error in the budget over OTL would be a large increase locally.
More ports also makes good sense regarding security, harder to blockade, and security is a huge driver in the CW.

And railways? Well guage is pretty standardised. Ireland and I think Victoria run on 1600mm, India runs on 1676mm (as does Chile lol), New Zealand and South Africa on 1067mm which the Cape to Cairo railway will make standard in Africa. And everywhere else runs on the 1435mm standard guage.
 
FYI population to 1911

OTL Population 1891

England 27.7m, Ireland 4.7m, Scotland 3.5m, Wales 1.8m, Canada 4.8m, Newfoundland 0.202m, New South Wales 1.124m, Victoria 1.140m, Queensland 0.400m, Tasmania 0.151, South Australia 0.345m, Western Australia 0.053m, New Zealand 0.7m, Fiji 0.121m, Cape Colony 1.5m, Natal 1m, India 224.5m

UK 37.70m Dominion 11.57m Total 49.27m
TOTAL = 273.736m

ITTL Population 1891

England 28.1m, Ireland 4.7m, Scotland 3.5m, Wales 1.8m, Canada 5.8m, Newfoundland 0.23m, New South Wales 1.26m, Victoria 1.24m, Queensland 0.42m, Tasmania 0.16m, South Australia 0.37m, Western Australia 0.07m, New Zealand 0.85m, Fiji 0.13m, Cape Colony 1.6m, Natal 1.1m, India 226.5

UK 38.10m Dominion 13.23m Total 51.43m
TOTAL = 277.33m

===//

OTL Population 1901

England 30.55m, Ireland 4.46m, Scotland 4.47m, Wales 2.01m, Canada 5.37m, Newfoundland 0.22m, Australia 3.79m, New Zealand 0.82m, Fiji 0.12m, Cape Colony 2.35m, Natal 1.10m, India 238.40m

UK 41.49m Dominion 13.77m Total 55.26m
TOTAL = 293.67m

ITTL Population 1901

England 32.1m, Ireland 4.6m, Scotland 4.6m, Wales 2.1m, Canada 6.8m, Newfoundland 0.27m, Australia 4.01m, New Zealand 0.98m, Fiji 0.15m, Cape Colony 2.41m, Natal 1.3m, India 233.3

UK 43.40m Dominion 16.02m Total 59.32m
TOTAL = 292.63m

1902 Orange River 0.39m Transvaal 1.27m

43.4m UK 16.02m Dominions 1.66m Boer = 60.98m

===//

OTL Population 1911

England 33.86m, Ireland 4.39m, Scotland 4.76m, Wales 2.21m, Canada 7.21m, Newfoundland 0.26m, Australia 4.46m, New Zealand 1.06m, Fiji 0.14m, South Africa 5.97m, India 252.09m

UK 45.22m Dominion 19.10m Total 64.32m
TOTAL = 316.11m

ITTL Population 1911

England 37.82m, Ireland 4.61m, Scotland 4.93m, Wales 2.58m, Canada 10.53m, Newfoundland 0.30m, Australia 4.95m, New Zealand 1.34m, Fiji 0.18m, South Africa 6.78m, India 243.17

UK 49.94m Dominion 24.08m Total 74.02m
TOTAL = 317.49m


USA population

OTL
1870 38.56m
1880 50.19m
1890 62.97m
1900 76.21m
1910 92.23m

ITTL
1870 38.56m
1880 49.18m
1890 60.27m
1900 72.77m
1910 85.71m
 
Last edited:
So less migrants to the US and less people for India. Here's hoping the population decrease will help prevent a famine like in WW2.
Pretty much and yes, the changes in India have pretty much killed famine. And another factor about the US population slowing is substantial migration to Canada.
 
Is there any worry that the government of India bill would become so watered down it would not change much and perhaps even offend Indian nationalists who so far have collaborated with the government
 
Is there any worry that the government of India bill would become so watered down it would not change much and perhaps even offend Indian nationalists who so far have collaborated with the government
Quite a lot actually, whatever the result of the Wallington commission are, they will be highly controversial. Lord Wallington was chosen deliberately, he's the OTL George Trevelyan. ITTL he became Prime Minster before Campbell-Bannerman and then Viceroy of India, he's a moderate reformer unlike the radical Grey and Morley.
 
Top