possible-nuclear bombing of military and economic targets in and around
Hanoi,
Not feasible due to potential international condemnation against bombing densely-populated targets. Economic targets are often close to population centers. About military targets, most North Vietnamese military targets were either mobile such as their Anti-Aircraft defense and RADAR systems, or easily to construct such as secret dirt/concrete airfield.
In addition, you have just opened the Pandora Box that is the use of a nuclear weapon. Now there is a precedent that it is now acceptable to casually drop a few sunshine in a proxy war. This is not only terrible for the people who lived in these conflicts, but also cause most countries to even more aggressively pursue nuclear weapons as a deterrent. Imagine nuclear-capable Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt in the 80s.
the
mining of
Haiphong harbor and other ports,
This was already implemented by OTL. Most Soviet aids were disrupted due to the mining of North Vietnamese water, but aid still flowed into North Vietnam through the Chinese-Vietnamese border.
saturation bombing of Hanoi and Haiphong,
the
bombing of dikes to destroy the food supply of much of the population of North Vietnam,
Causing intentional destruction to civilian centers is not very productive to propaganda, but you have just secured the loyalty of the North Vietnamese people for Hanoi, not that they never lacked it anyways. This would definitely hinder the ability to supply NLF forces tho, since you just destroy their logistics hub with nuclear fire.
air strikes against North Vietnam's northeast line of communications as well as passes and bridges at the Chinese border, and air and ground attacks on other targets throughout Vietnam.
Communications during the 1960s were very easy to fix when it was just a few telephone/telegraph lines. During the war, the North Vietnamese repair team could just repair the communication lines faster than the US could destroy it.
Conclusion: These policies are either ineffective or effective at the cost of American international reputation. So it might bring the war end faster, as either anti-war movement pressure require you to limit further American involvement or scares the North Vietnamese government so much with mushroom cloud they agreed to left South Vietnam alone.
Or the timelines stays nearly the same as OTL. Who knows?